Empowering yourself with runes

It was palaeography – the study of the ancient origins of writing – that led me to the runes over twenty years ago. Runes comprise a system of divination (and magic) that has been used by shamans for more than 3 000 years. The runes whisper wisdom across the ages by providing us with a practical tool for guidance in life when the hectic nature of everyday existence sometimes obscures the greater picture.

Traditionally, runes are carved into bark and wood or engraved on stone. The word  ”write” originally meant “to scratch or cut” (compare the German cognate “ritze”), while “book” is a variant of “Beech” (tree). Even “read” originally meant “to decipher”.

While studying these northern shamanistic scribblings, and related symbolism, I’ve found remarkable cross-mapping with other major divinatory systems, including that of the sangomas of southern Africa. I’m holding a day workshop in Cape Town, on Saturday 12 May, to share the secrets of rune reading as a valuable tool for lateral thinking in decision making. You’re welcome to contact me at runemagic@icon.co.za for more details on the upcoming workshop or visit my website at www.icon.co.za/~runemagic.

Share
Posted in Words | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Equilibrium in opposites

Hot is not the opposite of cold. It’s a question of degree. “Lukewarm” and “warm” are part of the dynamic of the hot/cold continuum. What’s fascinating is how words can take on a polar opposite meaning within a few generations. Almost as though the underbelly of a word is being revealed.

The word “egregious”, originally meant “remarkably good”. Today it means “outstandingly bad” or even “shocking”.  In the nineteenth century, the word “awful” used to mean “wonderful to behold”, literally “awe-ful”or “It fills me with awe”!

However, there are also examples of words with originally negative connotations that have taken on a positive or upbeat meaning. Here’s a funny one. “To fun” was the medieval verb “to con”. Over time, the meaning relaxed to imply playing an innocent trick on someone – and that’s how we’ve derived the noun, “fun”.

In American slang, kids use adjectives with tongue firmly in cheek. Labelling something as “bad”, from their rebellious perspective, actually means “awesomely good”. In France, too, the “banlieusard” kids living in the sprawling slums of greater Paris, speak “Verlan” as a cool ghetto lingo. Literally translated “Verse-In” (inverse / reverse talk) from “L’envers”, a simple coffee (café), for example, becomes a “féca”.

I’d venture that our toying with opposite meanings as a reflection of the whole is our subconscious understanding of the dialectics of existence and the acknowledgement that there is a flip-side to everything. Best of all, we have choice in what we wish to see in and express about our world – the proverbial “Is the glass half full or half empty?” challenge.

Share
Posted in Words | Leave a comment

The Eden conundrum

I’ve recently completed a short Kabbalah course. The rich imagery of the Biblical Old Testament is stronger than its fury. While a knowledge of Hebrew and gematria unlocks a greater understanding of the teaching behind the myths, my interest in popular psychology and wordplay prompted the following interpretation:

The Garden of Eden myth relates to Mankind’s necessary relationship towards, and engagement with, God – the Supreme Divinity.

Eve represents the right brain (intuitive foresight) and is future oriented, while Adam represents the left brain (conservative “status quo” thinking). The snake seduces Eve with its sly insinuations, which allows Adam to follow in her steps so that they can shed (like a snake sloughing off its skin) their sated lifestyle in paradise.

There’s a move from subjectivity within the garden, to objectivity, or logic, outside, facilitated by the newly-acquired knowledge of good and evil. Adam and Eve together represent the archetype for left and right brain synthesis. The gift bestowed upon them by eating of the Tree of Knowledge is the gain of cosmic consciousness through balanced awareness.

The juxtaposition of sensuality (seeing the world through our senses) with God-consciousness (as represented by Eden), coupled with the wisdom of discernment informed by the knowledge of differentiation, sets in play the dynamic necessary to perceive, comprehend and transcend our physicality.

In the final analysis, Eden (God’s gazebo) is earth’s counterpoint. The dynamic tension between GOOD (GOD), on the one hand, and EVIL (the DEVIL), on the other, evokes counterbalanced power, with spiritual aspirations anchored by sensual reality. EDEN may be broken into two complementary Hebrew words: ED (witness or testimony) and DN (judgment “DoNe”).

Our life challenge is to renounce overt attachment to physicality in order to get back to the GOD-IN (Garden of Eden). We need to re-member our origin and honour our Source in order to be re-born. We are masters of our destiny and we have a divine obligation to engineer a life that fully reflects and develops our unique skills set. Without the lesson of sharing and giving while on earth, and the ultimate renunciation of the flesh (matter), we cannot hope to regain the kingdom of God.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized, Words | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Musing on the meaning of “Mmmm…”

Some food for thought on the universal utterance of  “Mmmm”, from a sound symbolic point of view:

The Roman M is related to the Egytian hieroglyph or pictogram for water. The human body is three quarters water. A baby Mouths the Mmmm sound to petition Milk from MaMa (the latter being the cross-cultural tag for Mother – as named by the baby itself). Milk, like water, is life-giving. The infant is applying sympathetic magic to satisfy its needs for sustenance. [Amusingly, “to MuMMify” something is to “feed it” in order to symbolically preserve it for the afterlife. A Muse feeds your inspiration. Amusing, non?]

 Adults intone Mmmm to denote anticipation of something delectable to eat, drink or symbolically consume… it’s a MeMory of the MaMMary gland’s offering! MeM-OR-EE has an esoteric etymology combining water with the reflective quality of gold (OR), hence light, brought into focus (“ee”).  MeMory Mirrors Magically and acts as a Mind MiMic. (Water is the prototype of all mirrors.)

If M is watery, this gives us a hidden insight into the meaning of Matter. All first letters have acrocratic significance (i.e. the principle of being a-head / on top). M unlocks the watery element within words that it inhabits, and, especially, words that it initiates. Observing the M which informs the word MATTER, we can deduce, by analogy, that it reflects the qualitative nature of water, hence waves, within mater-iality. Experientially we see matter as solid, when in fact, everything is in a state of flux and vibrating at a certain frequency. Frequency is all about wave motion. Matter is the “stuff” making up our world as we know it. The phonemal translation of Matter is MATER = mother, or the matrix of life. The Queen is addressed MAM because she is the Mother of all Mothers. She’s the Queen Bee. My Oh My!

 The sound symbolic value of T denotes positionality… and especially so at the end of a word. Most words with T are “pointed”. T is derived from the glyph of an upright arrow. From dated Palaeolithic cave art we can see that the arrow glyph already served as an ideogram for “motion towards” – long before the arrowhead was invented. Hence: To. This and thaT. Observe the onomatopoeic character of the word HiT… it evokes a swishing movement that ends in abrupt conTacT. Similarly, other verbs: baT, biTe, geT, paT, peT, seT, spiT; or nouns: doT, denT, spot… geT the TiTTillating poinT?

 

Share
Posted in Letters, Sound Symbolism | Tagged , | Leave a comment

English language trivia

1. The Global Language Monitor estimates that there are more than a million words in the English language.

2. Over a dozen words are currently created each day. Very few of those, however, gain sufficient critical mass or “stickiness” to endure and be rewarded with dictionary recognition.

3. Shakespeare sported a vocabulary of 17 000 words, representing four times the lexicon of an average Elizabethan intellectual.

4. The Bard contributed about 3 000 new words to the English language – most of which are still in use today.

5. The longest non-medical word is floccinaucinihilipilification, which means “the act of estimating as worthless”.

6. Dreamt is the only English word ending in “mt”.

7. There are no words in the English language which rhyme with silver or orange.

8. The three words in English that end in “uu” are vacuum, residuum and continuum.

Share
Posted in Letters, Words | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Homophones visited upon me lately

Lightning recap. Homophones are words that have a similar pronounciation but different  spelling and different meanings. They continue to be the bane of literate society.

The following homophones brought some levity to my dismal week of copy chopping:

An email from a client, with a rhetorical comment on my editing – bristling with red tracking, remarked, “I hope I haven’t given you to many grey hairs?” Now I’d love to have replied: “Some, yes. But not as many as at the bottom of my garden. And if that’s too cryptic an answer, do a to-too tango with your question. Then look at my answer and imagine my grey lawn rabbits in a line, marching backwards in indignation. Yup, that’s what your homophonic hitch provoked… by analogy – a receding hare-line. And lots of mirth in the process.”

From a writers’ freelancer E-group came the following personal announcement, “Folks, I’m sorry I’ve been so scares lately, but…” Now I’d loved to have replied (but was tripped up by a hefty dollop of decorum inculcated by exemplary parents): “Absence is certainly not as scary as a homophonic clanger!”

Curiously, I fell victim to my own rant by opening the draft with “Lightening” instead of “Lightning”! A variation on Muphrey’s Law perhaps? Which homophones have assailed your eyes of late and what might you have loved to have replied?

Share
Posted in Language Use, Words | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The dragon’s secret

The Chinese Year of the Dragon (2012) has sunk its talons into the collective psyche of  the western world. So I grabbed my trusty SKEAT’s Concise Etymological Dictionary of the English Language (revised edition, 1885) to cast light upon the origin of the word.

Dragon is derived from the Latin (draco) and the earlier Greek (drakon), meaning ”sea serpent”. Yet the real secret lies in the symbolism  unlocked by the related Greek verb: “drakein” i.e. ”to see clearly”. From an eastern point of view, dragons are beautifully benevolent (as opposed to the demonised version in Christianity), representing rythmic life and embodying uncluttered vision.

South African billionaire and tourist cosmonaut, Mark Shuttleworth, has a pet project – an emerging market investment group called “Here Be Dragons”. The phrase denotes unexplored, and by association, dangerous territory, since it was medieval practice for cartographers to embellish unchartered areas of maps with mythological creatures or sea (see?) serpents. What a superb tag for the spirit of rugged and indomitable entrepreneurial exploration.

The Johnny Nash  song “I can see clearly now / I can see all obstacles in my way / It’s going to be a bright (bright), bright (bright), sun-shiny day!” became the sixties tune associated with the Coca Cola brand.

May your Year of the Dragon bring you clear vision and light up your way. For – excuse me mixing metaphors – in the words of Leonardo da Vinci: “When you  have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been and there you will always return.”

Share
Posted in Words | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Resonating with Byron

“Words are things; and a small drop of ink

falling like dew upon a thought, produces

that which makes thousands, perhaps millions, think.”

– Lord Byron (1788-1824)

Share
Posted in Uncategorized, Words | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

My karma ran over my dogma

However objective you may wish to be as a writer, there will always be a lens through which you perceive and colour the world.  Your writing will reveal shades of your  cultural identity, political affiliations, moral compass and “education”, for example.

 The word “education” is an interesting one. From the Latin “educo” (I raise up), and an even more archaic version “e(x)duco”, the real sense of education is a process whereby one is “led out of” (ignorance?), hence “shaped”. However, it also has the connotation of “leading away” – which is the aspect I wish to examine.

 An “educated” individual will always see the world via the filter of his or her specialisation. Even when thinking about something, our thoughts are clouded by the language with which we are accustomed to associate. When we read the news, we subconsciously choose to read the articles whose headlines proclaim our world view and gloss over those which don’t reinforce our gradually accreted belief system.

On an even more subtle level, one assumes an artifice as a writer. French philosopher Michel Foucault puts it succinctly:

“As soon as you start writing, even if it is under your real name, you start to function as somebody slightly different, as a ‘writer’. You establish from yourself to yourself continuities and a level of coherence which is not quite the same as your real life… All this ends up constituting a kind of neo-identity which is not identical to your identity as a citizen or your social identity. Besides you know this very well, since you want to protect your private life.”

My little vice is writing in a Victorian style. A bit pedantic for the Digital Age maybe. Perhaps I’m a romantic. Nostalgic, certainly. Style aside, let’s constantly guard againt becoming victims of our own potential dogmatism. Let’s celebrate the multi-faceted nature of “truth”and keep in mind that consensual reality is merely an unwritten societal arrangement for order and civility. And being a “writer” is the right of everyone, irrespective of background or so called “education”.

Share
Posted in Language Use, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

On the economy of writing

“It’s always just 26 letters of the alphabet and a handful of punctuation, and that is so staggeringly elegant… it’s just you and the page, and there is something very addictive about that.” – Alan Moore

Share
Posted in Language Use, Letters | Tagged | Leave a comment